Archive for January, 2009

Love What You Buy – Take Pride in Your Stuff

admin January 30th, 2009

You would think that the notion of “loving what you buy” would be anathema to Christian simple livers, but not in this case. Here’s why:

Consumer Reports

The March 2009 issue of Consumer Reports includes an article on people who continue to use very old appliances. This is great because it provides mainstream support for maintaining and re-using expensive appliances, an idea which, at this moment, may find even greater support given the recession.

Some of the appliances noted in the article were really old, including a 1926 gas stove and a 1936 toaster; some a little more recent like the 1955 vacuum cleaner; and, an almost trendy 1980 color TV – all in routine daily use, and well-cared-for – not to mention the 11 year old goldfish.

Every person interviewed showed great pride in their machines as much as in their care for them. Maintaining them had become a meaningful part of their lives and they simply didn’t have a need for anything newer. Many of the interviewees mentioned that they worked better and lasted longer (obviously) than their modern counterparts. There is also the monetary benefit of the maintenance costs being lower than the purchase price for several new appliances that most of us would have bought over that same period of time.

Benefits

There are obvious benefits to the environment of not trashing these appliances and constantly buying new ones: less stuff in landfills leaching chemicals into the ground water, and increased depletion of resources, etc.

But a Small Downside

However there is a small downside to this as well: many older appliances aren’t as energy efficient as new ones. But we should also consider that the increased efficiency of some classes of appliances are so small that compared to the efficiencies of continued use and buying fewer big-ticket items, it’s a wash. That is not true for some appliances like refrigerators which have become vastly more efficient over the years, so we’d need to think carefully about keeping very old ones.

There is also the issue that focusing primarily on energy efficiency isn’t going to “save us” in the end. Technological solutions such as more efficient machinery will never overcome both world-wide population growth and our ego need to have and use as much stuff as we can get our hands on. The real solution is to have a massive shift in our group psychology toward living with and using much less of everything. Our consumer mental illness drives us to think of ways of saving ourselves without having to make any changes or give up anything. There is no free lunch! If the fewer things we use are also energy efficient, that would be good, but the better over-all strategy will be to use much less in the first place.

Mindful Living

A key to keeping and using things longer is that we have to care for them, use them mindfully and judiciously, and maintain them regularly. Lots of us don’t want to be bothered with that because it takes too much effort – better to just throw it away and get another one.
But as simple livers, we should be living mindfully already, and if we live with true mindfulness, we will not only take better care of what we have, but doing so will be a joyful experience rather than an objectionable chore. As for folks who don’t already live that way, it is a learnable skill that will improve lives as well as our world.

Examples

I hesitate to write this because it sounds like I’m tooting my horn, but here are a few examples of how an ordinary lazy person like myself, can easily use old stuff:

    My car is 14 years old and fairly fuel efficient. I take some pride in keeping it going and the longer it goes, the more pride I feel in it. And… it’s paid-off! Plus maintenance and repairs cost half of what the payments on another used car would cost and only a quarter of what a comparable new car would cost. Some day it will die or become more expensive to maintain than buying another one and at that time I’ll have a little memorial service for it. But at that time I’ll buy a used car as I have for the past 25 years!

    My last computer was seven years old when I got a new one, and I’m still using the old one for file storage and to backup my newer machine.

    We have a 1960’s vintage vacuum cleaner that I still use for cleaning up after renovation projects and when I don’t want to lug the newer one upstairs to vacuum the floors.

    We have no furniture newer than about 10 years old and most of it is 20 or older and one piece is over 140 years old, and we didn’t buy it as an antique and we use it every day – and it looks it.

A New Mental Strategy

Living with older stuff requires buying higher quality appliances rather than participating in the big box store’s ‘race to the bottom’ strategy of only selling cheap stuff. This may mean purchasing at a higher price as well as a making a commitment to caring for these items from the moment we purchase them or they just won’t last.

This requires a new mental strategy: when you buy it, be thinking that it will be with you for the rest of your life. When we feel this way we will almost automatically select higher quality stuff and we will feel a greater investment in it – and in its maintenance – and it will last a lot longer.

No Need to Apologize

I think another lesson here, especially for those of us already committed to living simply, is that we should take pride in our efficient/long term use of things rather than apologizing for it. (“Oh I just like having old things.” “I just haven’t gotten around to getting a new one yet.” “I want to take it to the Antiques Roadshow!”)

In addition to changing how we feel and think about ourselves and our stuff, it will help to market or evangelize the whole notion of simplicity, and eventually the world will be grateful.

Buying and maintaining for the long run not only reduces our footprint and makes better use of what God gave us, but also shows others that it is a joy and a benefit to live for the long term by living simply, so they’re more likely to try it themselves.

A Compassionate Response to the Economic Crisis

admin January 18th, 2009

Consumer culture is sick, and needs a compassionate response from us!

The current economic meltdown has been caused by a severe chronic illness that is causing a lot of pain. It begs for a compassionate cure that only Christians who practice simplicity can provide.

As Christians who live faithfully and simply, we have something of great value to offer this newly troubled consumer world. In fact our intervention now could be crucial to society’s, and the Church’s, long term survival. BTW, it’s interesting that the word ‘crucial’ is derived from the Latin word cross, so this may be an opportunity for us to carry ours!

Christian simple living offers a healing perspective on the poverty and illness slowly emerging out of the economic chaos, and it might finally be seen as a welcome alternative to consumer culture. I believe that Jesus would want us to help the newly poor, and heal the sickness underlying the new poverty, although in some cases it is just a lowered standard of living rather than true poverty.

You could fairly say that in the past, consumer society just appeared to us to be sick because of our theology/philosophy of life, but now, we have all seen the hard evidence that in fact it really is an illness.

As a society we are caught in a vicious circle. Our individual and society-wide sense of entitlement to a good (you could even say wealthy) life pervades every aspect of our culture and economy to the point that it has become the most significant driver of our culture – and fate.

Over the course of the Twentieth Century our ego’s sense of entitlement has been carefully nurtured by business and industry and now it drives our economic decision making from our consumer purchases to how we invest for college and retirement to how we frame the business models of multinational corporations. This sense of entitlement boils down to “I want more money faster so I can support the extravagant lifestyle advertisers tell me I so richly deserve!” The resulting consumerism, speculation, and corporate empire-building, has led us to the current economic meltdown.

But apparently there is a consensus that the cure for this ego disorder seems to be to put still more money back into our personal and corporate pockets so we can all get back to spending money again and “rebuild” the economy. (Brings to mind the old saw that the definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing over and over while expecting a different result each time.)

This kind of cure is, at heart, a Ponzi scheme, and it is what makes it a vicious circle. And although the cure may make us feel like it is doing some small amount of good in the short run, it will only foment an even worse crisis in the not-too-distant future, because it not only doesn’t address the real problem, it feeds it.

As a society we could break out of the vicious circle, but of course we won’t. For too many people it just feels too good to be out there accumulating “wealth,” as the brokerages now insist on calling our “savings.”

…and like the heroin addict who feels sooo good when he shoots-up, then feels sooo bad when he comes down (and in his pain thinks mainly about where to get the next fix so he can stop the pain) we too, even in our economic misery, think only about our next high. Without treatment the addict’s body eventually becomes so sick that that he dies of organ failure. Our consumer addiction is likely to do the same to us individually and as a society.

So our economic crisis truly is an illness causing much pain and even some real poverty while much of society refuses to deal with the root cause and get on with living simply.

They need us now!

This may, in fact, turn out to be the best opportunity we will have in this century to help people understand why Christian simple living is a real cure rather than another Ponzi scheme… and we should probably start in our own congregations, because oddly enough, the Church, regardless of what Jesus taught, has rarely spoken out strongly on this issue with conviction and energy, much less taken meaningful action on it – so our congregations are filling with the newly poor… and sick.

What are some specific actions you believe we might take to minister during the crisis?

Finally – A Hopeful Christmas This Year

admin January 2nd, 2009

For years I have tried to hold up the banner of “less is more” at Christmastime along with a small band of folks dedicated to voluntary simplicity. And each year I think I have become less and less popular when I suggest that it might be good to buy fewer gifts at the mall and instead donate the money to those who actually need it, or give time and effort to those we care about instead of gifts. Some even thought I was just a kill-joy and was taking all the fun out of Christmas.

What a change this year!

This year, I didn’t talk to a single soul who didn’t say they were buying and spending less than they ever have before – some with a little self-righteous tone in their voice (covering-up their disappointment), others with palpable sadness.

“It’s so hard on the kids!”

Not the kids I know. Certainly not the very young kids who, in years past, end up with a huge pile of gifts and are simply confused and tired-out by all the excess, or who make the sensible decision to just play with the cardboard boxes and wrapping paper and ignore the expensive electronic toys and to-die-for, cute talking animals.

I cherish my memories of Christmas when I was a kid, not because there were a lot of gifts (there were usually only 3 or 4, plus a stocking full of fruit and candy) but because each of those few gifts meant a lot more to me since there were so few, and they were so thoughtful and needed. They had real value, and I still remember many of them very clearly. Unfortunately very few kids in this generation will remember much of what they got because there is far too much to be appreciated, and few gifts will be prized for years to come.

I didn’t know it back then, but it was simplicity, and it was enough – more than enough. The memories are worth far more than the cost of the few gifts.

This year plenty of people were nodding their heads in agreement as I talked about what a simple Christmas can be: more about people and less about stuff. And as encouraging as it is at the moment, it probably is not the beginning of a simplicity renaissance. If history is any predictor, shortly after the economy begins to improve, many will revert to type and simplicity will become a mere warm memory to tell the kids about, or maybe a nightmare to be forgotten.

In my more optimistic moments I think of this as a teachable moment because the feelings generated by not having so much money (or more debt) and presents, and what we had to do to “make-do” will make lessons more memorable. That would make it a good season to give a few books on simplicity to a few good prospects like Your Money or Your Life, by Joe Dominguez, Vicki Robin, and Monique Tilford, or Animal, Vegetable, Miracle by Barbara Kingsolver.

And I even found a few people who were actually enjoying the idea of a simpler Christmas with less stuff and more people. That is truly good news.