Archive for October, 2009

Stopping Shopping Hormones

admin October 27th, 2009

Why does this buying ‘thing’ have so much control over me?

The research says that a substantial part of our desire to buy stuff is chemical – hormonal – which is why more and more health professionals are concluding that there is a shopping addiction diagnosis, and that its mechanisms are virtually identical to classic substance addictions.

When we see something we want to buy and begin contemplating that possibility, our endorphins and dopamine kick in giving us that well known ‘rush’. So the act of looking and buying feels very good and exciting which pushes us to pursue the good feeling and not let it go. It’s like sex: once you start it’s really hard to stop, and for many of the same chemical-hormonal reasons – it just feels good.

Of course that good feeling has absolutely nothing to do with reality. We may not have any need for the thing we’re contemplating, and in fact if we did buy it, it might end up unused in a closet, or it might drive our credit card over its limit and give us severe buyer’s remorse, or worse. But it feels sooo good! We don’t want to lose that thrill.

But it is a chemical thrill that is separate from the thing’s utility for us, or its unintended consequences.

This is what caused me so much heartburn when I recently bought a new van, even though buying new cars, which I pointed out in my last post, has been anathema to me for many years.

I knew the chemicals were kicking in as soon as the Cash for Clunkers program was announced and I saw a van I wanted at a great price. I knew the feeling I had was hormonal, but it sure did feel good. So I tried to put the excitement in my back pocket long enough to think through the logic of this buying decision.

Well, my back pocket leaked! Every time I considered the facts of the matter, I could feel my thinking being contaminated by the thrill, so it became more and more difficult to sort out my logical conclusions from hormone-driven emotional ones. I just couldn’t tell the difference after a while! And I knew it – and knew I was in trouble.

Marketers are very aware of this dynamic and prey upon it, much like cigarette manufacturers knew for years that their products caused cancer even while they targeted youth in their advertising. They knew that once kids started smoking the chemistry would overcome most of the research evidence regarding the dangers they might hear about. Manufacturers knew the chemistry would win.

They know that for most of us in the developed world, our chemistry will win most of the time if they just design their marketing campaigns well. They are praying (as well as preying) that all of our back pockets will leak and that our rational judgment will continue to be clouded by our hormones so they can make money.

Nothing wrong with making money, UNLESS it is made by harming people or God’s world. And unfortunately buying what we don’t need or can’t afford, and what the planet can’t tolerate, harms us, our wellbeing, our communities, our environment, and can even undermine our faith practice.

All businesses should only market what we need, not what our chemistry tells us we want, or what their market capitalization levels tell them they should have. Yes, businesses will make less money, but there is a great deal of good in a lowered standard of living and lowered expectations in the developed world – which the current recession should have taught us, but apparently hasn’t, given the continuing practices of Wall Street and multinational corporations.

Oh, and by the way, we shouldn’t buy into the notion that fewer sales and a lowered standard of living will throw everyone out of work and into poverty. Good econometric models will show that economies adjust to these changes so that even with less business, work will be prorated so that employment levels over time will remain reasonable, even if at lower pay rates, especially if we slowly move in that direction rather than letting yet another economic bubble burst which always suddenly throws large numbers of people out of work for long periods of time.

But my current problem – our problem – is how to deal with it today so we can indeed live simply.

The best way I know to do this is to:

1. Be constantly aware of our addiction and the chemicals swarming our brains.
2. When we feel that dopamine-induced euphoria coming on, STOP. Do not make a purchasing decision.
3. Get the opinions of those we trust to be rational simple livers, about whether this purchase would make sense.
4. Think it through and make a tentative decision.
5. Get the concurrence of your significant other, family or close friends.
6. If other’s opinions tend toward a non-purchase, and/or your S.O. does not concur, SKIP IT!

It is even be better to go through this process before we begin contemplating a purchase or making a shopping trip.

Go prepared to deal with your hormones and the marketers rather than letting them take control of you and then belatedly trying to back out of it and then be rational – very hard to do!

Prevention is the best medicine for addiction.

Car Angst

admin October 21st, 2009

Well, it’s been another long dry spell for new posts. I’m very sorry for the absence. From now on I will schedule my week so that I get in more timely posts – promise!

During the dry spell, though, I encountered another simple living ethical dilemma and I’d love to hear from some of you on how you handle these things.

For some time we have had two vehicles: a fourteen year old Subaru which we got used, and an eleven year old minivan (also used) that we use for trucking our puppet ministry paraphernalia to schools and churches for shows. I’ve been worried about their dependability for some time so I started looking for a used replacement for one of them. Then the cash for clunkers program popped up and I found that with the government’s cash plus a whopping discount by a local dealer, I could get a new low-end van for the same price as the used vans I’d looked at. So I decided to go for it.

Oh, the buyer’s remorse!! Or perhaps the simple liver’s remorse.

I really can’t remember the last time I bought a new car. I’ve almost always bought used cars because that is both economically and ecologically sound purchasing, so my first pang of anguish was over abandoning this long-held value. This evolved into an extended back and forth with myself over whether or not this was morally the right way to go:

    YES, it’s better to buy used because it makes better use of what has already been built and saves resources, BUT NO, a new vehicle will serve us longer and is therefore economic good sense, BUT YES, a new van would be less polluting, BUT NO – I’m only doing this for the thrill of buying a brand new shiny toy and its short lived adrenalin payoff, BUT YES, all vehicles die no matter what and sooner or later I have to get another one – better to get 15 or 20 full years out of a new one rather than 10 to 12 years from a used one, BUT NO, I’m abandoning a deeply held, nearly religious principle to pursue an ego need, BUT… and so on… and the angst still lingers.

It also raised many issues around what is and is not the most economical and ecologically sound way to go when buying and maintaining vehicles.

As a purely rational, data-driven decision, it quickly gets very complicated. I would need to calculate many parameters and populate them with current data including the total life cycle cost both the new, used, and current vehicles prorated for inflation and improved efficiencies of both manufacturing (including its pollution from mine to manufacturing to recycling and blast furnace) and operating each vehicle in terms of cost and ecological impact, along with estimates of average lifetime and maintenance costs of both and the economic impact of keeping my current car or buying new or used on my vanishing finances.

Even the current trend to hybrids didn’t help. Not only where there no hybrid vans available, it turns out that their environmental efficiency isn’t as good as that claimed by manufacturers when you include the mining and manufacturing pollution and resource depletion for these highly technologically complex machines driven by batteries sometimes requiring exotic metals, as well as the weight of hybrids compared to comparably sized conventional cars (battery and wire for electric motors and more complex drive train, etc.).

And, I suppose I’d even have to know how to add and subtract to figure all that out. Phat chanse.

So, after reading many “expert” opinions on all of this I found many diverse (often not really “evidence based,” but merely personal) opinions that were often at odds with each other. No help there!

Then of course there is the argument for having no motorized vehicles at all and instead using public transportation, shoe leather, and a bicycle – an excellent thing to do – but it would put a serious dent in our puppetry business (having to move stages, sound equipment scenery, puppeteers, etc.) and I wouldn’t feel safe commuting in a heavy traffic urban area on my bike anymore after too many hip surgeries.

Ouch! Too many complications!

So, blinded by the facts, I went ahead and made the primarily emotional decision to take the money and go for the new one. On the positive side, the new one does get better gas mileage and it has somewhat better pollution controls. On the negative side, I’m now much poorer, but on the positive side again, that might make Jesus happy.

Not a good experience – and I don’t feel good about the new van either. Too much money, too little satisfaction, and I still don’t know if it was the best thing to do!

So what’s the solution for all those times we will all have to buy something, and don’t want to buy what we don’t need, and also want to be sure that what we do buy isn’t aiding and abetting the destruction of God’s world?

Our brains aren’t big enough to figure all this out!

That’s literally the conclusion I came to, which can actually be seen as a theological as well as a simple living issue. One of the reasons we should rely on God, is that we’ve got small brains (compared to the size and complexity of the universe), and on top of that we have historically not been very wise as a species. We’ve spent thousands of years building our towers of Babble, one after the other, each time followed by much celebrating and back-slapping, and then despair as the thing crumbles… again.

Reason and logic can be great tools for routine day-to-day tasks, but we should keep in mind that we still can’t even predict the weather accurately beyond a two to five day horizon. I won’t even get into the accuracy of economic models or the policies they support!

For the complex or very long term issues, we come up way short when we rely exclusively on our number crunching and model building. I’ve worked in the research area for a number of years and I believe the most important thing I learned was that our research and our data, while useful, has severe limits and we aren’t good at recognizing when we’ve reached those limits.

Instead, when it comes to such complexity, we should consult what evidence exists, and then follow the prophets’ and Jesus’ teachings to do the best we can not to harm other people or god’s world, and to trust that our faith in Him will get us through along with a healthy dose of grace – data or no data.

What do you think?